Former President Donald Trump’s speeches have taken an interesting turn lately. Alongside his familiar promises to build a border wall and drill for oil, he has added a new pledge – to construct a state-of-the-art missile defense shield similar to Israel’s Iron Dome, but even better and covering the entire United States. Trump believes it’s time for America to have its own Iron Dome.
The appeal is apparent, especially from a presidential candidate known for his ambitious infrastructure projects. It aligns with Trump’s message that the world is a dangerous place, and only he can protect Americans from harm. However, despite the promises, the reality of building an impenetrable “giant dome” over the entire country is far more complex than it seems.
The Current State of Missile Defense
The United States military has invested significant resources and years of research into missile defense development. They have explored various methods, from space-based weapons to robot Gatling guns and laser beam-emitting jumbo jets. Enormous radar systems have been deployed in remote Arctic areas to detect and track incoming missiles. Some of the most powerful supercomputers and brilliant scientists at MIT have been involved in calculating missile defense strategies.
While these efforts have yielded success in shooting down short-range missiles, they have fallen short in countering the longer-range threats faced by the U.S. homeland. Current missile defense systems, including those resembling Israel’s Iron Dome, are designed for point defense, protecting specific locations like overseas military bases and naval ships. The continental U.S., being much larger than Israel, faces a different kind of threat – intercontinental ballistic missiles launched from countries like Russia or China.
The Challenge of Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles
Intercontinental ballistic missiles travel at extremely high speeds and trajectories, making them significantly more challenging to intercept. Hitting these missiles with accuracy requires launching multiple interceptors, as each one has a relatively low probability of success. The cost of interceptors is higher than the missiles they aim to destroy, as they require advanced guidance systems and larger quantities.
Moreover, overwhelming missile defenses by launching a mass attack is a straightforward tactic. The math simply doesn’t work when defending against a country like Russia or China on such a large scale. Army Reserve Lt. Gen. A.C. Roper, vice commander of U.S. aerospace defense for North American Aerospace Defense Command, has acknowledged that it is neither feasible nor affordable to defend everything by placing a Patriot or THAAD battery on every street corner.
The Reality of Trump’s Great Dome
While Trump’s promise of building a “greatest dome ever” may sound enticing, the current capabilities of missile defense systems fall short of protecting the entire United States against intercontinental ballistic missiles. The existing systems, including Iron Dome, are designed for short-range missile defense and point defense, not for countering the kinds of threats faced by the U.S. homeland.
It is crucial to consider the challenges posed by the speed and trajectory of intercontinental ballistic missiles. While the U.S. military has made significant progress in missile defense, it cannot guarantee complete protection against a mass attack from a major global power.
In conclusion, Trump’s pledge to build a state-of-the-art missile defense shield covering the entire United States may be aspirational, but it faces substantial technological and financial challenges. While America continues to invest in missile defense systems, the reality of achieving an impenetrable “giant dome” remains a complex and costly endeavor.
To read the original article, visit F5mag.com.