Lizzo’s ongoing legal battle took another turn as a judge denied her request to dismiss a lawsuit filed by three of her former dancers. This decision means that the case will proceed, bringing attention to the allegations made against the popular singer.
Dismissal Request Denied
Judge Mark H. Epstein, presiding over the case in Los Angeles County Superior Court, ruled against Lizzo’s argument to dismiss the lawsuit entirely under the anti-SLAPP statute. While some parts of the case did not fit the grounds for dismissal, the judge acknowledged that others did.
Anti-SLAPP Statute
The anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) statute is designed to protect defendants’ right to free speech under the First Amendment by swiftly dismissing meritless lawsuits. In this instance, the judge determined that Lizzo’s requirement for dancers to participate in a nude photoshoot for her show, “Watch Out for the Big Grrrls,” was protected as part of the creative process and fell under the umbrella of free speech.
Difficult Issues Arise
Judge Epstein recognized the complexity of the case, stating that finding the right balance between protecting free speech and addressing allegations of misconduct and discrimination is no easy task. He emphasized the court’s responsibility to consider allegations seriously while avoiding intervention in constitutionally protected activities.
Plaintiff’s Allegations
The original lawsuit, filed by Arianna Davis, Crystal Williams, and Noelle Rodriguez, accused Lizzo of creating a hostile work environment and sexually harassing her employees. It also named dance captain Shirlene Quigley and Lizzo’s production company, Big Grrrl Big Touring, Inc., as defendants. The suit further alleged that Quigley proselytized to the dancers, including shaming those who engaged in pre-marital sex.
Lizzo’s Response
Lizzo has vehemently denied all allegations against her, describing them as false, unbelievable, and outrageous. A spokesperson for Lizzo expressed gratitude that the judge dismissed parts of the plaintiffs’ claims but stated intent to appeal the remaining elements of the lawsuit.
A Victory for Justice
The plaintiffs’ attorney, Ron Zambrano, celebrated the judge’s ruling, considering it a victory on balance. He emphasized that the ruling sends a clear message that fame does not shield celebrities like Lizzo from accountability for reprehensible conduct.
Another Lawsuit Looms
In addition to this case, Lizzo faces a separate lawsuit filed by a former employee, a fashion designer who alleges mistreatment by Lizzo’s wardrobe manager. This lawsuit reveals further allegations of mocking and bullying towards employees, including the dancers. Lizzo attempted to have this suit dismissed at the end of last year but was unsuccessful.
For more information on this ongoing case, please visit F5 Magazine.